Understanding the lawsuit against NAR’s Commissions in Simple Terms

Imagine you’re selling your house. Usually, you pay a commission to both the agent who helps you sell (listing agent) and the agent who brings the buyer (buyer’s agent). This commission is typically a percentage of the sale price, and it’s split between the two agents.

In 2023, a lawsuit argued that the National Association of Realtors (NAR), a big organization for real estate agents, and two big brokerage firms (Homeservices of America and Keller Williams Realty) were working together to keep these commissions high, making it more expensive for people to buy and sell houses.
The plaintiffs claimed that NAR rules, along with agreements between NAR and the brokerages, made it hard for sellers to negotiate lower commissions or choose agents who charged less. This allegedly inflated commission rates overall. It was argued that a fixed minimum commission for buyer’s agents, regardless of the agent’s experience, workload, or effectiveness can inflate fees because it doesn’t reward more efficient or productive agents. The lawsuit claims these practices discourage the growth of discount brokers who charge lower fees, further limiting competition and keeping commission rates high. NAR and the brokerages maintain that the current rules benefit consumers by ensuring buyer’s agents are adequately compensated and incentivized to bring deals to the table.

A court agreed with the plaintiffs and found NAR and the two brokerages liable. They were ordered to pay a total of $1.8 billion in damages.

The concern is that the traditional commission structure can be relatively high, leading to sizable costs for both buyers and sellers. Some argue that these commissions might not always align with the effort or time spent by the agents. Additionally, with advancements in technology, there are alternative ways to buy or sell homes, such as online platforms, which has sparked discussions about whether the traditional commission model is still the most appropriate or fair way to compensate real estate agents for their services.

This is a big deal because it could change how real estate commissions work in the United States. It’s still early to say exactly how things will play out, but it’s possible that home buyers and sellers will have more options and potentially pay less for agent services. The lawsuit is ongoing, and the final impact on commission rates is still uncertain. However, the verdict could potentially lead to changes in the way real estate commissions are determined and negotiated, potentially benefiting home buyers and sellers.

It’s important to note that this is a complex situation, and there are different perspectives on the lawsuit and its implications.

Scroll to Top